[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: dpkg_1.16.1.1~bpo60+1_i386.changes REJECTED

Raphael Hertzog schrieb am Montag, den 07. November 2011:

> Hi,
> On Thu, 03 Nov 2011, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> >  So, to sum it up: I totally understand why a backport of dpkg-dev would
> > be wanted and makes sense (to some degree, see next paragraph), but the
> > situation is that dpkg-dev isn't a source package on its own and given
> I can easily tweak the .changes files to only upload dpkg-dev and
> libdpkg-perl.
> Would you be ready to try this?
Do we have an upgrade way to the new version that its unstable soon? I don't
want an old version without updates in bpo.


Alexander Wirt, formorer@formorer.de 
CC99 2DDD D39E 75B0 B0AA  B25C D35B BC99 BC7D 020A

Reply to: