Re: dpkg_1.16.1.1~bpo60+1_i386.changes REJECTED
Hi,
On Thu, 03 Nov 2011, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> So, to sum it up: I totally understand why a backport of dpkg-dev would
> be wanted and makes sense (to some degree, see next paragraph), but the
> situation is that dpkg-dev isn't a source package on its own and given
I can easily tweak the .changes files to only upload dpkg-dev and
libdpkg-perl.
Would you be ready to try this?
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer
Pre-order a copy of the Debian Administrator's Handbook and help
liberate it: http://debian-handbook.info/go/ulule-rh/
Reply to: