[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: dpkg_1.16.1.1~bpo60+1_i386.changes REJECTED

On Mon, 07 Nov 2011, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> Raphael Hertzog schrieb am Montag, den 07. November 2011:
> > The only caveat is that the next version of dpkg-dev depends a new perl
> > module (libfile-fcntllock-perl). We can either backport this module
> > too or I can revert this specific change (it's a single self-contained
> > commit):
> > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=dpkg/dpkg.git;a=commitdiff;h=d834b77b5d16e453b32bd36bbb5487c910e54280
> I don't see a problem in backporting libfile-fcntllock-perl. But as mira
> stated you have to adjust the rules and control files so that every buildd
> build only dpkg-dev and the perl lib. Are you willing to do that?


Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer

Pre-order a copy of the Debian Administrator's Handbook and help
liberate it: http://debian-handbook.info/go/ulule-rh/

Reply to: