Re: nginx
Gerfried Fuchs <rhonda@deb.at> writes:
> * Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@lsi.com> [2010-01-18 23:41:54 CET]:
>> Of all the areas, backporting is the easiest. It's the natural best
>> place for newbies start out and cut their teeth.
> This I highly disagree with. Backports is meant as addition for the
> stable release. The stable release is known to actually _be_ stable -
> and people would also expect some sort of stability/relieability with
> respect to packages from backports. When even long-standing Debian
> Developer's like Bubulle or me fail at times in this area then actually
> I really don't want to see even more issues pop up just because it's
> seen as being "easiest" or "place for newbies" - because it just isn't.
> People are using packages from stable - and with that also packages
> _for_ stable - on production systems. Having some sort of relieable
> quality in here is a very valid request and wish and I don't think that
> people would like to dig around who actually maintains the backport to
> check wether they could trust the package or not to some degree. I'm
> very glad that Alex is doing the gatekeeper job in this respect - even
> though it doesn't gain him any sympathy or nice words.
I think this is a very important point and I want to emphasize it as
well. Debian normally has a fairly extensive aging process before any
package reaches a stable release, with lots of people using the package
who are willing to report bugs (at least for packages that see a fair bit
of use). Backports are sort of like playing without a net. They get very
little testing before being made directly available to stable users: only
the testing that the uploader does before uploading.
The changes are usually minimal from a version that's in testing, which
helps, but I still get nervous whenever I upload a backport. It's one of
those things that works 90% of the time and looks really easy, but the 10%
cases can be a significant challenge.
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: nginx
- From: daniel <drmartens@gnu.univ.gda.pl>
- Re: nginx
- From: Alexander Reichle-Schmehl <tolimar@debian.org>
- Re: nginx
- From: daniel <drmartens@gnu.univ.gda.pl>
- Re: nginx
- From: Lee Azzarello <lee@dropio.com>
- Re: nginx
- From: Alexander Wirt <formorer@debian.org>
- Re: nginx
- From: Lee Azzarello <lee@dropio.com>
- Re: nginx
- From: Alexander Wirt <formorer@formorer.de>
- Re: nginx
- From: daniel <drmartens@gnu.univ.gda.pl>
- Re: nginx
- From: Jan Ingvoldstad <frettled@gmail.com>
- Re: nginx
- From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@lsi.com>
- Re: nginx
- From: Gerfried Fuchs <rhonda@deb.at>