Re: RAID
Albert Dengg <a_d@gmx.at> writes:
> Albert Dengg wrote:
>
>> Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, but I just configure it to use one of the discs and dynamically
>>> switch it to the other one if the disc goes bad.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> whats the difference with other raid 0/4/5/6?
>> you have to write to data to the bootsector of the discs that
>> physically is bootet..
>> (ok with level 0 you can skip writing to all discs since if one is
>> shot you have a non functioning array anyway....)
>
> ....
> ah sorry just an error in thought...
> but: whats the point of having /boot on raid0?
> and for 5/6: the amount of space wasted is maginal
>
> yours
> Albert
No point in that. Put / (including /boot) on raid1. Do the same for
swap. And then put everything else on lvm on raid5 (/var, /usr, /home,
/mnt/data, ...).
MfG
Goswin
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: RAID
- From: lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Lennart Sorensen)
- References:
- Re: RAID
- From: Alexander Charbonnet <alexander@charbonnet.com>
- Re: RAID
- From: lordSauron <lordsauronthegreat@gmail.com>
- Re: RAID
- From: lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Lennart Sorensen)
- Re: RAID
- From: lordSauron <lordsauronthegreat@gmail.com>
- Re: RAID
- From: Colin Baker <colin@colinbaker.org>
- Re: RAID
- From: Andrew Sharp <andy@netfall.com>
- Re: RAID
- From: Lionel Elie Mamane <lionel@mamane.lu>
- Re: RAID
- From: lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Lennart Sorensen)
- Re: RAID
- From: Lionel Elie Mamane <lionel@mamane.lu>
- Re: RAID
- From: Albert Dengg <a_d@gmx.at>
- Re: RAID
- From: Albert Dengg <a_d@gmx.at>