Re: RAID

To: debian-amd64@lists.debian.org
Cc: Colin Baker <colin@colinbaker.org>
Subject: Re: RAID
From: Alexander Charbonnet <alexander@charbonnet.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 11:18:39 -0600
Message-id: <[🔎] 200511091118.39580.alexander@charbonnet.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 43722E98.40603@colinbaker.org>
References: <[🔎] e5a3e9ac0511081214h6aa4abbu6f4ec987525cd620@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20051109144050.GM9486@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> <[🔎] 43722E98.40603@colinbaker.org>

> Getting way off-topic here, but I really wish people would stop calling
> raid 0 a raid, as there is nothing redundant about it.  Just aid 0, maybe?

That's the "0" part.  There's zero RAID happening!

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RAID
  - From: lordSauron <lordsauronthegreat@gmail.com>

References:
- RAID
  - From: lordSauron <lordsauronthegreat@gmail.com>
- Re: RAID
  - From: <list@murphy.debian.org>
- Re: RAID
  - From: Colin Baker <colin@colinbaker.org>

Prev by Date: Re: RAID
Next by Date: Re: GLIBC BUG still not fixed in stable package
Previous by thread: Re: RAID
Next by thread: Re: RAID
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread