[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: multiarch/bi-arch status (ETA) question

David Wood <obsidian@panix.com> writes:

> On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Hugo Mills wrote:
>>   They're not (directly) the way that the Debian multiarch is most
>> likely to go. Unfortunately, the relevant site seems to be down, but
>> take a look at [1], and possibly some of the other (Google cached)
>> files in [2].
> Just out of curiosity; does anyone know what was wrong with the
> way documented in:
> http://www.linuxbase.org/futures/ideas/multiarch/

Afaik that is completly based on and in sync with our multiarch
proposal and exactly what we want to achive.


Reply to: