Re: multiarch/bi-arch status (ETA) question

[Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>]

David Wood <obsidian@panix.com> writes:

> On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Hugo Mills wrote:
>
>>   They're not (directly) the way that the Debian multiarch is most
>> likely to go. Unfortunately, the relevant site seems to be down, but
>> take a look at [1], and possibly some of the other (Google cached)
>> files in [2].
>
> Just out of curiosity; does anyone know what was wrong with the
> way documented in:
>
> http://www.linuxbase.org/futures/ideas/multiarch/

Afaik that is completly based on and in sync with our multiarch
proposal and exactly what we want to achive.

MfG
        Goswin