Previously Martin Bialasinski wrote: > You use a bind-like config. Wouldn't it be easier to use sgml or xml > for the config? Looks like the whole world goes after it (even M$), so > there will be much code we can reuse. Methods for parsing are well > established. Frankly I don't really care about the syntax as long as it is easy to use and preferably easy to parse. It's a bit of a non-issue because the parser is easily changed as long as no official version is released. > Your opinion? I've never used sgml and xml, and I've already written a parser for the bind syntax once or twice, which is the only reason I used it. Wichert. -- ============================================================================== This combination of bytes forms a message written to you by Wichert Akkerman. E-Mail: wakkerma@cs.leidenuniv.nl WWW: http://www.wi.leidenuniv.nl/~wichert/
Attachment:
pgpzQs9c2SJDo.pgp
Description: PGP signature