[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Results of various tests with MVME167



On Thu, 2004-09-09 at 20:18, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 11:00:53PM +0200, Kars de Jong wrote:
> > 
> > > I'll try the MVME147 kernels tomorrow as well.
> > 
> > Sorry, didn't have time for that.
> > 
> > Anyway, I'm going on holiday for the next 2 1/2 weeks, so I leave you to
> > figure it out. Surely there are more people with an MVME16x board? At
> > least Nick Holgate seems to have one.
> 
> I rebuilt a set of kernel-image with that patch applied to the three VMEs. I
> can not test it, so I am not sure if this shold be uploaded, I leave this up
> to Stephen. I'll put the source and all on p.d.o~/cts/. If you want to
> upload it, you have to sign the changes, and make sure the dsc says Arch:
> m68k, I am afraid the i386 buildds try to build it otherwise...
> I am going on vacation, too, so if you have to rebuild for any reason,
> you're on your own...
> 
> Christian


I've did some sort test with the
kernel-image-2.4.27-mvme16x_2.4.27-2_m68k.deb  09-Sep-2004 14:24   2.3M 

version on a MVME177 (68060 cpu 50 Mhz and 64 Mbyte ram).

system booted with this version and was able to update packages etc.
So this version works much better then the 2.4.27-1 version which didn't
boot.

On scsi id 3 i have a cdrom installed, gave some disconnect error in
dmesg and didn't show up in /proc/scsi/scsi.
Same error was also displayed with version 2.2.25-mvme16x (debian sarge)




The test with the:
kernel-image-2.6.8-mvme16x_2.6.8-1_m68k.deb    29-Aug-2004 04:27   2.9M 
also on the MVME177.
Last line display: ABCGHIJK
problem with finding vmlinuz? 

If more info is needed just let me known.

-- 
----------
m.vr.gr.
Gerard Klaver



Reply to: