Re: Results of various tests with MVME167
On Tue, 7 Sep 2004, Kars de Jong wrote:
> So I built the 126.96.36.199 kernel based on my old config, and voila, it
> worked fine...
> Now it was time to find out which config option caused the problem...
> Took me quite some recompile/reboot cycles, but it turned out to be
> CONFIG_SINGLE_MEMORY_CHUNK. If this is NOT defined as "Y", the kernel
> crashes. And this is apparently also true for 2.4.x (x > ??) kernels.
IIRC, Richard Zidlicky reported this before, too.
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- email@example.com
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds