Re: Initial set of pages for debconf documentation was Re: committed sponsorships, payments and balancing books of debconf events
Reply in-line :-
On 17/04/2018, Héctor Orón Martínez <hector.oron@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
Hi,
> 2018-04-17 0:25 GMT+02:00 shirish शिरीष <shirishag75@gmail.com>:
>> @Hector - the list you shared of trusted organisations seems to be a
>> pretty small list, I do remembering reading somewhere a longish list
>> but maybe that's old and the last list was correct. Could you or
>> somebody else reconfirm. If it's just 5 names, just could put a new
>> page tomorrow evening and add the five organisations therein.
>
> I hope it helps...
>
> https://www.debian.org/donations.en.html
> https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Treasurer/Organizations
>
Thank you. While yesterday the list of trusted organizations were
pointed out, having the link of donation pages was also useful and has
been shared.
I also did some edits to clarify from whatever I know which hopefully
would guide prospective debconf organizers and attendees a bit more.
> Cheers,
> --
> Héctor Orón -.. . -... .. .- -. -.. . ...- . .-.. --- .--. . .-.
>
The one thing which I couldn't find a page for Minidebconf either in
debconf pages or in wiki.debian.org/ sub-pages.
I could put up a Minidebconf page with some initial blurb and then
people more knowledgeable than me could fill/correct in the rest.
I could also put up info. about Debian release parties and maybe even
Debian pre-release parties although AFAIK there hasn't been any
movement on latter or how that should work in order to have a better
Debian release.
The pre-release party might be a debian-devel topic or should be
discussed somewhere else or even might have been discussed, I have no
idea.
Looking forward to know.
--
Regards,
Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल
My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com
EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE A73A 2C2F 9F3D C7A4 E1C4 D2D8
Reply to: