also sprach David Bremner <david@tethera.net> [2015-01-19 19:56 +0100]:
> On the other hand, extapolating from my own experience, I'm sure
> there is plenty of individual work on Debian that happens because
> people are at debcamp, that would not otherwise happen.
I've always been in this camp, just ftr.
> As far as people's concerns about people not making productive use of
> their time at debcamp or debconf, I think one point that we did have
> strong concensus on is that we want "what did you accomplish at previous
> debcamp / debconf" to play an important role in the evaluation process
> [2]
++ on this. While it might take us a year or two, generally
establishing an understanding among our participants the we want
DebConf to be bloody good in terms of enabling people getting stuff
done and also in terms of content and being clear that we will use
past experience for future decisions should encourage people to put
effort into proposals of sprints and events, and thus improve the
whole conf.
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@debconf.org> @martinkrafft
: :' : DebConf orga team
`. `'`
`- DebConf15: Heidelberg, Germany: http://debconf15.debconf.org
DebConf16: Cape Town or Montreal? https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf16
Attachment:
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)