Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@gwolf.org> writes: > tony mancill dijo [Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:11:44PM -0800]: >> Thanks for working on this. I think we'd have OLCC issues (for those >> not from this area, the Oregon Liquor Control Commission) anywhere >> (even in the countryside), so having servers at a private event at >> Puppet Labs seems like the most preferable option. (And my 0.02, I'd >> rather bring my glass to a server and ask for a pour than have a >> 1oz./30mL in a little sample cup.) If we spread the servers around >> to several tables and interleave those with multiple cheese tables, >> it should be a nice party. > > Right. If it is a hard-requisite (I clearly don't see us taking buses > to the countryside as doable for C&W), we should accept the servers > requirement. It will be quite strange, though. > > And, of course, we will have to *pay* them. Any idea on how much does > a licensed (is a license required?) bartender charge per, say, 4-5 > hours? How many would we hire? The demand will not be constant; I > believe having 10 at the beginning would cause quite a bit of > contention, but having more than 3 at the end would be wasteful. Puppet Labs is handling all the expenses, possibly servers/bartenders, even insurance. Yay! -- Gerald Turner <gturner@unzane.com> Encrypted mail preferred! OpenPGP: 4096R / CA89 B27A 30FA 66C5 1B80 3858 EC94 2276 FDB8 716D
Attachment:
pgpxFe7uzvken.pgp
Description: PGP signature