[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Debconf-team] procedings


* Christian Perrier <bubulle@debian.org> [060412 23:15]:

> Well, there's at least one paper which, ahem, is a bit long...:-)
> /me hides...

You can run but you can't hide!

BTW:  For next year I would propose some kind of a seperate review phase
for the papers.  Although we offered the speakers to review their
papers, not a single one used this oportunity.  All submitted their
papers quite late.  So now we are standing here, with some papers to
long, some papers in the wrong format, and some were submitted with the
comment "should be proof read by an non en_DE reader".

All in all it might be even an idea to rethink our "we use LaTeX, looks
best" concept; sometimes it's quite difficult to get all that stuff
together in LaTeX (but would be far more easier, if there weren't
docbook xml submissions with tables).

Yours sincerely,


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: