On Thu, Sep 27, 2001 at 11:49:09PM -0400, Russell Nelson wrote: > Craig Sanders writes: > > On Thu, Sep 27, 2001 at 05:11:39PM -0400, Russell Nelson wrote: > > > Given that our domain name is (still) being held hostage by SPI, I'd > > > like to know what was decided at the board meeting. > > your rewriting of history may go down well on slashdot, but most of > > us here were involved and remember the circumstances and the chain of > > events. > Nobody disputed any of the facts in my Advogato article at > http://www.advogato.org/article/329.html . Can we possibly not rehash this entire tiresome argument? Russ, given that OSI is meant to be a PR effort to make free software acceptable to the business world, maybe you could put some effort into avoiding public infighting? Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``Freedom itself was attacked this morning by faceless cowards. And freedom will be defended.'' Condolences to all involved.
Description: PGP signature