Re: xprt-xprintorg taking over xprt: now or later?

To: debian-x@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: xprt-xprintorg taking over xprt: now or later?
From: Marc Wilson <msw@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 19:40:10 -0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 20041229034010.GC12495@rei.moonkingdom.net>
Mail-followup-to: debian-x@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 41D19D06.4020704@web.de>
References: <[🔎] 1102378171.7609.39.camel@pug.anu.edu.au> <[🔎] 20041207023340.GC19977@rei.moonkingdom.net> <[🔎] 1689817.PZ6oydAmsa@zigzag.lvk.cs.msu.su> <[🔎] 1102408714.5397.7.camel@catsby.fooishbar.org> <[🔎] 41D19D06.4020704@web.de>

On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 06:51:02PM +0100, David Schweiger wrote:
> Daniel Stone wrote:
> >Ideally, we could get rid of both, but such is life.
> 
> Why ? Xprint is one of the greatest innovations for Unix+Linux printing 
> in the last five years and becomes more and more widespread.

And name one application where it has support other than Mozilla, please.

-- 
 Marc Wilson |     To kick or not to kick...  -- Somewhere on IRC,
 msw@cox.net |     inspired by Shakespeare

Reply to:

References:
- xprt-xprintorg taking over xprt: now or later?
  - From: Drew Parsons <dparsons@debian.org>
- Re: xprt-xprintorg taking over xprt: now or later?
  - From: Marc Wilson <msw@cox.net>
- Re: xprt-xprintorg taking over xprt: now or later?
  - From: "Nikita V. Youshchenko" <yoush@cs.msu.su>
- Re: xprt-xprintorg taking over xprt: now or later?
  - From: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
- Re: xprt-xprintorg taking over xprt: now or later?
  - From: David Schweiger <dvschweiger@web.de>

Prev by Date: Re: xprt-xprintorg taking over xprt: now or later?
Next by Date: Bug#287612: xlibosmesa4 must depend on xlibmesa-gl
Previous by thread: Re: xprt-xprintorg taking over xprt: now or later?
Next by thread: Re: xprt-xprintorg taking over xprt: now or later?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread