Re: here is an updated patch 908 for 18.104.22.168
>>>>> In <1041815288.1927.18.camel@thor>
>>>>> Michel Dänzer <email@example.com> wrote:
>> On Son, 2003-01-05 at 03:10, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > >> On sparc plathome, I'm not success to build because many drivers uses
>> > >> vgaHW* function call. We should write patches like #082 or some other
>> > >> hacks (e.g dummy vgaHW* call add to sparc environment).
>> > e.g dummy vgaHW* functions add to sparc environment.
>> Does it have to be dummy? We don't have legacy hardware on PowerMacs
>> either, but we have a (partly at least) working vgaHW, though I think it
>> depends on some kernel support which may not be available on sparc.
Perhaps, No it doesn't. It is an example. Currently I don't know
detail about `we should implement vgaHW* functions as full functions?,
dummy? or other way??....'
<firstname.lastname@example.org>, <email@example.com>, <firstname.lastname@example.org>