Re: Website Designs
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Merely lists which web pages are in scope -- but nothing of the
> audience. It also hand waves at the usual goodies: unified, accessible,
> no javascript or flash, etc. There is nothing concrete, or anything of
> any real substance here, when it comes to real goals or a target
> audience.
>
> [...]
>
> So, since my telepathy powers are obviously on the blink, can
> you tell me what the goals of the rewrite (apart from the 30000 foot
> buzzwords of accessibility, browser independence, restrict javascript)
> are? What are we trying to achieve (well, apart from look prettier, and
> perhaps reduce information presented [not sure about the last one]).
As far as I am concerned, looking prettier is exactly what I'd like
to be achieved, nothing more. Please consider the layout change page a
way to achieve a unified, more appealing website.
I do not believe there is a priority conflict, since changing the
layout is almost orthogonal to reorganising the website. They can be
separate projects. In fact, the former hardly qualifies as a rewrite,
since changing the layout could be done by only changing the CSS.
Regards,
--
Sam.
Reply to: