Re: Website Designs
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 02:00:53 +0200, Sam Hocevar <email@example.com> said:
> As far as I am concerned, looking prettier is exactly what I'd like
> to be achieved, nothing more. Please consider the layout change page a
> way to achieve a unified, more appealing website.
> I do not believe there is a priority conflict, since changing the
> layout is almost orthogonal to reorganising the website. They can be
> separate projects. In fact, the former hardly qualifies as a rewrite,
> since changing the layout could be done by only changing the CSS.
Ah. If this is just about adding bling, and not about things
like removing security advisories from the top page to help lambda
users, then my interest in this efforts fade. Please ignore the noise,
then. I would be interested in a functional improvement to the
website, but am indifferent to subjective aesthetics.
A certain amount of opposition is a help, not a hindrance. Kites rise
against the wind, not with it.
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.golden-gryphon.com/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C