Quoting Francesca Ciceri (madamezou@debian.org): > I'm not completely sure about it. > I mean: they are clearly disturbing and stupid messages, and a lot of > dangerous trolling (dangerous for the ideas in the messages, not for the > trolling itself), but on the other hand I think that it's important to > have those messages visible to all, as a warning and reminder of what > happened. > I know that they are really disturbing, but without that in the archive > I, for example, have never known about that situation. > > I don't think that in the second stage they have to be tagged as spam, > but surely they could be tagged as "inappropriate". > > What do you think about it? This is really a matter of personal taste. I will tag them as spam but I understand that others may prefer tagging as inappropriate. To explain my position : this person intentionnally spammed the mailing list with hate messages. He also harrassed several d-w contributors in private and was "banned" from the mailing list by listmasters (however, as he was constantly changing origin mail address, this had no real effect). I consider that tagging his "mails" as spam is indeed applying the list ban.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature