Hi, On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 06:09:18PM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote: [...] > > Please notice that I personnally also tagged all "contributions" by > MikeUSA as spam. I hope that others have, too, as it would also help > getting rid of his hate messages. Still, there is a chance that > someone considers these "messages" as "on topic" and therefore not > spam, but eh..... I'm not completely sure about it. I mean: they are clearly disturbing and stupid messages, and a lot of dangerous trolling (dangerous for the ideas in the messages, not for the trolling itself), but on the other hand I think that it's important to have those messages visible to all, as a warning and reminder of what happened. I know that they are really disturbing, but without that in the archive I, for example, have never known about that situation. I don't think that in the second stage they have to be tagged as spam, but surely they could be tagged as "inappropriate". What do you think about it? Cheers, Francesca -- "People assume that time is a strict progression of cause to effect, but actually from a non-linear, non-subjective viewpoint is more like a big ball of wibbly wobbly, timey wimey... stuff." The Doctor
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature