[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: contact address for anti-harassment policies

On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 20:15, Don Armstrong <don@debian.org> wrote:
> I would hate for someone to not report harassment occurring because
> they felt that a contact address was inappropriate for the type of
> harassment that they received (or perhaps had the appearance of
> associated with the agent of harassment.[1])
> Furthermore, I think a @debian.org alias sends a message that
> harassment is something that the entire project finds objectionable,
> whereas one at a subdomain indicates that only that subset may find it
> objectionable.

+1 for the @d.o address. Additionally, could the debian (or
debian-women) website also list the people that would receive those

IME, quite often the intent is in the right place, but if there is no
follow-up action, a victim can lose faith soon.

vid ॥ http://svaksha.com

Reply to: