Quoting Amaya (email@example.com): > Don Armstrong wrote: > > Furthermore, I think a @debian.org alias sends a message that > > harassment is something that the entire project finds objectionable, > > whereas one at a subdomain indicates that only that subset may find it > > objectionable. > > +1 This argument completely changed my mind. +1 again, though I don't really buy Don's argument that harassment doesn't necessarily follow the usual heteronormative roles. In 99.9% percent of cases, it probably does. Still, the "strong message" argument of a @d.o address wins anyway, for me.
Description: Digital signature