Re: contact address for anti-harassment policies
On Tuesday 14 December 2010 02:02:02 Francesca Ciceri wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 12:15:31PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > On Sun, 12 Dec 2010, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > > A reasonable role address which came to my mind is
> > > "antiharassment@women.d.o".
> >
> > As a few others have already stated, I think it would be ideal to have
> > an overall alias for this, with possible additional aliases
> > @women.debian.org.
> >
> > I would hate for someone to not report harassment occurring because
> > they felt that a contact address was inappropriate for the type of
> > harassment that they received (or perhaps had the appearance of
> > associated with the agent of harassment.[1])
> >
> > Furthermore, I think a @debian.org alias sends a message that
> > harassment is something that the entire project finds objectionable,
> > whereas one at a subdomain indicates that only that subset may find it
> > objectionable.
> >
> >
> > Don Armstrong
> >
> > 1: After all, even sexual harassment doesn't necessarily follow
> > heteronormative roles.
>
> +1
>
> I completely agree with Don.
>
> Francesca
+1
Lisi
Reply to: