On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 06:43:14PM +1000, Jenn Vesperman wrote: > On Mon, 2004-08-09 at 03:05, Erinn Clark wrote: > > > That is something else I think -women members should address: this > > > debian subproject is producing a set of documents which look like it > > > cannot be in debian because it is not free software. I didn't even > > > realise such things were allowed on alioth. > > This is mostly a matter of my own ignorance. I'm not really sure how to > > license it, since I know very little about licensing of websites etc. > > Perhaps you can help? I have no intentions of making it "non-free", I'm > > just not sure what's appropriate. Suggestions welcome. > http://www.opencontent.org/ and http://creativecommons.org/ are good > places to start with making non-programs 'free'. Not really. All of the licenses published by both organizations fail to live up to the DFSG. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature