[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Comments on the FAQ

On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 06:43:14PM +1000, Jenn Vesperman wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-08-09 at 03:05, Erinn Clark wrote:

> > > That is something else I think -women members should address: this 
> > > debian subproject is producing a set of documents which look like it 
> > > cannot be in debian because it is not free software. I didn't even 
> > > realise such things were allowed on alioth.

> > This is mostly a matter of my own ignorance. I'm not really sure how to
> > license it, since I know very little about licensing of websites etc.
> > Perhaps you can help? I have no intentions of making it "non-free", I'm
> > just not sure what's appropriate. Suggestions welcome.

> http://www.opencontent.org/ and http://creativecommons.org/ are good
> places to start with making non-programs 'free'.

Not really.  All of the licenses published by both organizations fail to
live up to the DFSG.

Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: