[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Comments on the FAQ

On Mon, 2004-08-09 at 03:05, Erinn Clark wrote:

> > That is something else I think -women members should address: this 
> > debian subproject is producing a set of documents which look like it 
> > cannot be in debian because it is not free software. I didn't even 
> > realise such things were allowed on alioth.
> This is mostly a matter of my own ignorance. I'm not really sure how to
> license it, since I know very little about licensing of websites etc.
> Perhaps you can help? I have no intentions of making it "non-free", I'm
> just not sure what's appropriate. Suggestions welcome.

http://www.opencontent.org/ and http://creativecommons.org/ are good
places to start with making non-programs 'free'.

I don't know how they work with Debian, but I use the Open Publications
Licence (or have in the past, I just noticed that Open Content now
endorses the Creative Commons licences).

I note, also, that it's been several days since I checked this folder
and someone else may have answered this. :)

Jenn V.
    "Do you ever wonder if there's a whole section of geek culture 
        	you miss out on by being a geek?" - Dancer.
   My book 'Essential CVS': published by O'Reilly in June 2003.
jenn@anthill.echidna.id.au     http://anthill.echidna.id.au/~jenn/

Reply to: