On 10374 March 1977, Orlando Fiol wrote: >>>I would love to adopt this package and try to make that changes that you >>>suggests. >> What changes? I do suggest multiple ways to go on now. > The changes that you suggests: > " > ... > But I would propose to change it to some of the following: > - A package that just contains the latest version, so interested > people always have that, and there arent hundreds of lg-issue* > packages. > Advantage: Small, easy to follow. Disadvantage: Only last issue > available. > - Provide a installer-like package that does the work of monthly > fetching the new issues and putting them in the right location for > .... > " That are still 2 points. :) Well, go on, retitle the bug so noone does needlessly work on the package(s) also and come back with a working system. I would like to have it in the near future, so the lg-* stuff is resolved, so dont take to long (how about 2 weeks from now on?). >> It looks like you are not a DD. I guarantee you that, if you want to >> keep them the way they are now you will have a hard time to find a >> sponsor, even if you move them to non-free... > You're right. Officially Im not, but I have experience packaging > applications. I also tried to introduce a package for a web gallery > system but some DD friend told me that is better if I adopt an orphan > package. And then you start with lg. Hrm. -- bye Joerg <Joey> Joey, provide a patch then.
Description: PGP signature