[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

name for the port



Hello,

I'm seeing a lot of argument that has already been discussed. See the
thread
originated on Menucc1's post:

http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2001/debian-devel-200108/thrd4.html

IIRC:

cygwin* cannot be used because it's a trademark
win* appears ugly to some persons (don't know why)
win32* is also a trademark?
w32* appears ugly to other persons
etc

I agree with the *-i386 extension, but if we, say, take:

w32-i386

what will the 64bit release be like, win64-ia64!?

IMHO, the best possible options would be:

w32 --> w64
win-i386 --> win-ia64
cyg-i386 --> cyg-ia64

If the name discussion needs to be repeated, please don't do it on
debian-devel. I'm pretty sure than half of the arguments on the
first one were just deliverate attempts to delay it..

regards,

-- 
----------------------------------------------------
Robert Millan          Debian GNU/Hurd user
zeratul2 wanadoo es    http://getyouriso.dyndns.org/
----------------------------------------------------
GPG ID C8D6942C
237F 8688 C2E5 BC64 E152  97B4 FB28 D41B C8D6 942C
----------------------------------------------------
Join us in civil disobedience and distribute DeCSS!!
----------------------------------------------------
/*     efdtt.c     Author:  Charles M. Hannum <root@ihack.net>            
*/
/*     Length:  434 bytes (excluding unnecessary newlines)                
*/
/*     Usage is:  cat title-key scrambled.vob | efdtt >clear.vob          
*/
/*     title-key can be read from the DVD by css-auth. (see livid.org)    
*/
#define m(i)(x[i]^s[i+84])<<
unsigned char x[5],y,s[2048];main(n){for(read(0,x,5);read(0,s,n=2048);write(1,s
,n))if(s[y=s[13]%8+20]/16%4==1){int i=m(1)17^256+m(0)8,k=m(2)0,j=m(4)17^m(3)9^k
*2-k%8^8,a=0,c=26;for(s[y]-=16;--c;j*=2)a=a*2^i&1,i=i/2^j&1<<24;for(j=127;++j<n
;c=c>y)c+=y=i^i/8^i>>4^i>>12,i=i>>8^y<<17,a^=a>>14,y=a^a*8^a<<6,a=a>>8^y<<9,k=s
[j],k="7Wo~'G_\216"[k&7]+2^"cr3sfw6v;*k+>/n."[k>>4]*2^k*257/8,s[j]=k^(k&k*2&34)
*6^c+~y;}}



Reply to: