On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 10:17:16PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > w32 --> w64 > win-i386 --> win-ia64 > cyg-i386 --> cyg-ia64 > I prefer ``w32 --> w64'' since we don't want to use win (as oposed to lose) and cyg is not obvious enough. As a second choice, I'd prefer ``w32-i386 --> w64-ia64'' which is ugly since it contains the number 64 twice. But more consequent because of hurd-i386. just my idea, Gerhard.