Le Mardi 3 Mai 2005 17:16, Alexis Sukrieh a écrit : > * Pierre Habouzit (pierre.habouzit@m4x.org) disait : > > for the specific parts of the package, that is ok. but I believe > > there is a few generic features every single webapp package should > > feature if possible. e.g. the DGDB configurations should not be > > package specific, but use a central tool that would allow the user > > to re-use a previous registered SGDB (wwwconfig-common already > > provides facilities, but does not stores the available SGDB, and > > also the user is forced to enter the same informations again and > > again, and it is *REALLY* frustrating) > > This is exactly what dbconfig-common provides: > > dbconfig-common is an implementation of the "best practices for > database applications" draft, which provides debian packagers > with an easy, reliable, and consistant method for managing > databases used by debian packages. indeed, but SGDB is not the only thing that is commonly used by web apps. dbconfig-common effort is nice and really welcome. SGDB is the most ovious example. but up to a point, vhosts are ressources too, and the possilibities/dialogs/... that a package shows about vhosts things should be normalized too (It's very frustrating too to have to tell every single webapp that *no* I'm not using apache1, apache-ssl, apache-perl but only apache2 ...) -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O OOO http://www.madism.org
Attachment:
pgp6h1rzyX5tm.pgp
Description: PGP signature