[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Changing how we handle non-free firmware



Quoting Ansgar (2022-08-23 19:44:17)
> > On 2022-08-23 18:50, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > > (I only see that being possible by treating the install image as not
> > > part of Debian, which I consider an unacceptable interpretation).
> 
> For me installation media are more or less just a glorified non-tarball
> of archive contents. So I apply the same standards I would apply to a
> tarball of the Debian archive (which would include non-free).

So you do not consider installation media part of Debian?


> Though I understand some people would like if non-free was removed from
> the archive as well (possibly to a separate archive).

I don't want non-free removed from the archive, and I would appreciate
if we could avoid expanding the topic of this discussion.

 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: signature


Reply to: