[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Asking DPL to shorten Discussion Period for rms-open-letter

Le dimanche 28 mars 2021 à 20:56:26+0200, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
> Quoting Pierre-Elliott Bécue (2021-03-28 20:31:01)
> > Le dimanche 28 mars 2021 � 14:04:48+0200, Jonas Smedegaard a �crit�:
> > > My involvement in this subthread was when Molly arguing that the 
> > > accusation was not harmful (using other words, yes, and we can 
> > > nitpick that if really necessary).  You (and others, privately) 
> > > agree that the accusations are deliberately harmful but that the 
> > > harm cannot backfire on Debian.  I have raised my concerns - I rest 
> > > my case.
> > 
> > Accusations are generally harmful, and as accusations are always 
> > delibeately made, they indeed tend to be deliberately harmful.
> > 
> > That does not mean they are not warranted. And I think it is that 
> > point that could/should be discussed.
> Text #1 oncludes an accusation.  Other proposed texts does not.
> I think the relevant thing to discuss is not if the accusation embedded 
> in text #1 is warranted, but instead if that accusation is necessary.  
> Is the accusation needed for that proposal?  It seems to me that the 
> message would be the same with that accusation omitted, but maybe I am 
> missing something.

What reason would you give to ask RMS' removal from the board of the FSF
if it were not for his ways of being/behaving and his attitudes?

Pierre-Elliott Bécue
GPG: 9AE0 4D98 6400 E3B6 7528  F493 0D44 2664 1949 74E2
It's far easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: