Re: Having a "DPL committee"?
On March 27, 2021 12:25:15 AM GMT+05:30, "Pierre-Elliott Bécue" <peb@debian.org> wrote:
>Le samedi 20 mars 2021 à 00:44:52+0530, Sruthi Chandran a écrit :
>>
>> On 20/03/21 12:31 am, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote:
>> > The idea was discussed two years ago. Sam chose a range of people
>to
>> > help him with delegations.
>> >
>> > Being a DPL is a high-energy thing even when one doesn't try to
>"lead"
>> > the project /per se/.
>> >
>> > Do you think the Project should consider the opportunity of trying
>to
>> > establish more clearly a role of "DPL advisors" who would be
>identified
>> > as helpers for the DPL and additional entry points for the
>> > developers/external people should the need arise?
>> >
>> > Cheers!
>> >
>> I definitely think we should have a panel of "DPL advisors/helpers"
>to
>> help out the DPL. There will definitely be a lot of administrative
>stuff
>> that can be delegated to the helpers and DPL can concentrate on other
>> important activities.
>>
>> If I become DPL, this would be one of the first things I would be
>> working out.
>
>Thanks Sruthi for your reply!
>
>What is your opinion about Jonathan's reply regarding the fact that
>working on having adapted teams (CT/Trademark) take part of the load in
>a way that is not directly tied to the DPL mandate is probably a better
>schema on the long run?
Having specific teams to deal with specific issues is definitely good. I would go with a hybrid approach, have more specific delegated teams and team of 2/3 people as DPL advisors. I also like the vice-DPL idea and might also consider that.
>
>Cheers!
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Reply to: