Hello, On Thu 25 Mar 2021 at 01:17PM -07, Sean Whitton wrote: > The point of this is not to call for the removal of the entire FSF > board, as the open letter does, while still supporting the main thrust > of the open letter, which is about Stallman himself. > > The vote to restore Stallman to the board was not unanimous, and there > is some confusion about how the procedure for elections to the board > actually works, so the call to remove *all* board members does not make > sense to me. And the FSF is going to need people with experience to > help it recover from this whole affair. > > There are probably others who think similarly to me about the call to > remove the whole board, so this amendment gives them something to vote > for in preference to just signing the open letter. It's an alternative > rather than a rival. Sruthi's new amendment doesn't make specific calls w.r.t. what the future organisation of the FSF should be, so it achieves the purposes I had in writing my amendment. I'm not going to withdraw my amendment because it seems like some people want to vote for it, but I will probably not be ranking it first myself. -- Sean Whitton
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature