[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: G+D weakening G

Hi,

On 05/12/2019 15:21, Sam Hartman wrote:

"Matthew" == Matthew Vernon <matthew@debian.org> writes:


     Matthew> Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> writes:
     >> I read [1], Guillem's message talking about how he believes the
     >> G+D proposal weakens option G alone.
     >>
     >> [1]:
     >> [🔎] 20191205001617.GA11219@gaara.hadrons.org">https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/[🔎] 20191205001617.GA11219@gaara.hadrons.org

     Matthew> Later in that thread ( Message-ID:
     Matthew> <[🔎] 20191205121800.GA75572@thunder.hadrons.org> ) Guillem
     Matthew> explicitly rebuts the suggestion that they are unhappy
     Matthew> about G+D appearing on the ballot:

     Matthew> " Just to clarify, and to avoid any possible reading of
     Matthew> subtext implying I'm unhappy with the combination in the
     Matthew> new proposal: "

Ah, reading that message for the second time, I agree with your
intrepretation.
It was less clear to me on first reading.
Do I assume correctly, therefore, that you now agree that G+D should be on the ballot? 

Regards,

Matthew
[it seems clear to me, but worth checking :) ]
Reply to: