Re: Last minute cominbations G+D and/or G+E
On Wed, 2019-12-04 at 17:11:49 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Thanks for this. No-one else has said anything. Having thought about
> it, I think Guillem's framing would lead me to a conclusion closer to
> Dmitry's E rather than my option D - but either is arguable.
As I mentioned in my “Reframing” reply, I think option E can be rather
problematic, as I'm not really sure what it does imply, and it seems
option D while trying to be very detailed ends up potentially not
being exhaustive enough and feels too rigid at times.
> To make it concrete I am going to post texts of those two options. If
> people come forward to say they support or or both of them I will
> formally propose them tomorrow morning (in the hope that the Secretary
> and/or the DPL will allow them on the ballot). If you support either
> of these options enough, then please formally propose it yourself and
> I will second it tomorrow.
> I do not intend either of these proposals to replace E or D, nor G.
Hmm, I've not checked the actual differences between the combined and
the individual options, but I have the feeling they would kind of
devalue G, as it would seem like it's missing something. I acknowledge
some people do believe it does miss something, but placed side-by-side
in this way, makes it weird. I guess I'd then need to try to articulate
the guidance and details (or lack thereof) in some explicit way to
append to the end on an amendment.
Thanks,
Guillem
Reply to: