Re: G+D weakening G

[Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org>]

>>>>> "Matthew" == Matthew Vernon <matthew@debian.org> writes:


    Matthew> Do I assume correctly, therefore, that you now agree that
    Matthew> G+D should be on the ballot?

I'm not going to stand in the way.
I think everything I wrote in my message is still true, including that I
 think the secretary is in a better position to judge than I
 am.

I think one additional thing is true that I was not sure of earlier.
Guillem doesn't object to it being on the ballot.
had I been sure of that I would not have written a message this morning.

I'm sorry that I'm being equivocal.  But when I ask myself "Sam, do you
agree that G+D should be on the ballot," the answer is neutral not yes.
If I had to take some action to get it on the ballot, I'd  take that
action.
But I've already effectively handed that off to someone else.

Right now I'm well into I'm done; I don't care; please can we vote.

--Sam