Re: G+D weakening G
Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> writes:
> I read [1], Guillem's message talking about how he believes the G+D
> proposal weakens option G alone.
>
> [1]:
> [🔎] 20191205001617.GA11219@gaara.hadrons.org">https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/[🔎] 20191205001617.GA11219@gaara.hadrons.org
Later in that thread (
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20191205121800.GA75572@thunder.hadrons.org>
) Guillem explicitly rebuts the suggestion that they are unhappy about
G+D appearing on the ballot:
"
Just to clarify, and to avoid any possible reading of subtext
implying I'm unhappy with the combination in the new proposal:
"
So it is clear to me that G+D should be on the ballot.
Regards,
Matthew
--
"At least you know where you are with Microsoft."
"True. I just wish I'd brought a paddle."
http://www.debian.org
Reply to: