Re: G+D weakening G
>>>>> "Matthew" == Matthew Vernon <matthew@debian.org> writes:
Matthew> Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> writes:
>> I read [1], Guillem's message talking about how he believes the
>> G+D proposal weakens option G alone.
>>
>> [1]:
>> [🔎] 20191205001617.GA11219@gaara.hadrons.org">https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/[🔎] 20191205001617.GA11219@gaara.hadrons.org
Matthew> Later in that thread ( Message-ID:
Matthew> <[🔎] 20191205121800.GA75572@thunder.hadrons.org> ) Guillem
Matthew> explicitly rebuts the suggestion that they are unhappy
Matthew> about G+D appearing on the ballot:
Matthew> " Just to clarify, and to avoid any possible reading of
Matthew> subtext implying I'm unhappy with the combination in the
Matthew> new proposal: "
Ah, reading that message for the second time, I agree with your
intrepretation.
It was less clear to me on first reading.
Reply to: