Re: Proposal: Init Diversity
On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 11:45:21AM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote:
> >>>>> "Kurt" == Kurt Roeckx <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Kurt> On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 02:39:09PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> >> Kurt Roeckx writes ("Re: Proposal: Init Diversity"): > I've
> >> currently put the title to "Packages should support >
> >> non-systemd". Suggestions welcome.
> >> Dmitry titled his posting "Init Diversity" which I think is
> >> appropriate.
> Kurt> We already have an "Afferm Init Diversity" ...
> I'm working on a new title for hartmans1; I'm hoping Ian or someone else
> will work with me to do that.
I've currently put them as:
Choice 1: Init deversity is Important and NMUable
Choice 2: Systemd but we support exploring alternatives
Choice 3: Focus on systemd for init system and other facilities
Choice 4: Support non-systemd systems, without blocking progress
Choice 5: Init diversity is Required
That should be visible on the website now, together with all other
changes I did today.