Re: Proposal: Init Diversity
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Dmitry Bogatov <KAction@disroot.org> writes:
> Here I formally propose new version of my draft, and withdraw all
> previous versions of it.
>
> Being able to run Debian systems with init systems other than
> systemd continues to be value for the project. Package MUST work
> with pid1 != systemd, unless it was designed by upstream to work
> exclusively with systemd and no support for running without
> systemd is available.
>
> Software is not to be considered to be designed by upstream to
> work exclusively with systemd, merely because upstream do not
> provide, and/or will not accept, an init script.
I second this proposal.
I further propose this amendment to it:
- ---begin
Being able to run Debian systems with init systems other than systemd
continues to be of value to the project. Every package MUST work with
pid1 != systemd, unless it was designed by upstream to work
exclusively with systemd and no support for running without systemd is
available.
Software is not to be considered to be designed by upstream to work
exclusively with systemd merely because upstream does not provide,
and/or will not accept, an init script.
- ---end
Since the word-wrapping has changed, here is a diff -w (minus the new
line-wrapping) so you can easily see the changes I actually made:
2c2
< systemd continues to be value for the project. Package MUST work
- ---
> systemd continues to be of value to the project. Every package MUST
> work
8c8
< work exclusively with systemd, merely because upstream do not
- ---
> work exclusively with systemd merely because upstream does not
It is my intent that this is merely a tidying up of the language, not a
change to the substance of your proposal.
Regards,
Matthew
- --
"At least you know where you are with Microsoft."
"True. I just wish I'd brought a paddle."
http://www.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.9 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>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=6TeW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: