[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposal: Init Diversity





On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 9:02 AM Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 11:10:13PM -0500, Brian Gupta wrote:
>
> Please consider the above version, and all future variants that contain
> nothing
> but grammar/wording changes, seconded by me. (As opposed to meaning
> changes.)

I was unable to verify your signature.

Trying again. If this doesn't work, I'll send as an attachment. (I didn't change my text, even though there have been some changes to the wording of the ammendment.)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Being able to run Debian systems with init systems other than
systemd continues to be value for the project. Package MUST work
with pid1 != systemd, unless it was designed by upstream to work
exclusively with systemd and no support for running without
systemd is available.

Software is not to be considered to be designed by upstream to
work exclusively with systemd, merely because upstream do not
provide, and/or will not accept, an init script.

- ---

Please consider the above version, and all future variants that contain nothing
but grammar/wording changes, seconded by me. (As opposed to meaning changes.)

e.g. - Maybe change "upstream do not provide" to "upstream does not provide"
       (I'm considering upstream a singular noun.)

Cheers,
Brian
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEErxE90OxJjNiEvcs2wPiGTNo9A1gFAl3WzAwACgkQwPiGTNo9
A1iN4g/8CbDsiXUEqMH1eBKy9eGIBLDYg1MV9NjTz4IeNhLf5K9O2HxXwM/8q58g
Frdcz/0o5f/tnl5XNgoZ6urw9tPcxWklSquHx03UyYMod+B/6BH5QK/8+R/5RDkD
1eEpA0L0O6Vznn6fVzDGSjxsG1yI6cE6MDYvx2Ax+r2/lE2AZ1fmCirGVVPE+Ih+
MnS1QDMrZZirDfvdADID7JKSYnRl4jjgoQJgPptxphzPHHlxfeYdIIwf20xSGncf
s2yTdx1nocZbF42J9yVQenTrtOLd4u4r85Hk1Us8VjlXxeysn8xxgreftsL9AqTp
7mn2Zvlv90x8P8Gtr6XS6bmJJMzSiyNMxkmkG9VZZdeG2IH1b4HdnSLWygR0MGuG
bX8werISahAdM074Lynnmud3Kji78Gf6a4QkUwLI+Rv6jfW1vtb+pKx24y5uCg1U
r4XQKyf2I5qBaBQZ+mdg2hj2TwgEGyWj1VihDNJNJ8agGY0jYiEaBaNjaCI+s+HG
dkVVc3eVvv3801SinuBJD3C0GcVpY2k+S0rkY09GHrzqbNjJVd3EwvVkwVKWlX1V
VTp99joXuUze1zzeAk+a4W1gyX67xKKiP7WOEEesKHD5q2GcKVln5X10Phuh8V+t
1s6oLIFv204duZ0kpwyI3edFBGSJ7n6JZp1B9s11Ot1bgq10Fh8=
=4xRL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply to: