[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Alternative proposal: support for alternative init systems is desirable but not mandatory



On 17/10/14 at 19:42 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 01:44:06PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 09:44:16AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > I am therefore bringing forward an alternative proposal
> > 
> > Recieved, and verified. Note, this has been proposed by the current
> > Project Leader, and thus does not require seconds, but will record those
> > seconding anyway.
> 
> I don't see him doing it with his DPL hat on, so Lucas can you
> clarify that you do this as DPL or not?  (But there seem to be
> enough seconds, so it doesn't seem to matter.)

I don't mind either way.
Let's say that I did not do this as DPL.
 
Lucas

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: