Re: Alternative proposal: support for alternative init systems is desirable but not mandatory
On Fri, October 17, 2014 19:42, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 01:44:06PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 09:44:16AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>> > I am therefore bringing forward an alternative proposal
>>
>> Recieved, and verified. Note, this has been proposed by the current
>> Project Leader, and thus does not require seconds, but will record those
>> seconding anyway.
>
> I don't see him doing it with his DPL hat on, so Lucas can you
> clarify that you do this as DPL or not? (But there seem to be
> enough seconds, so it doesn't seem to matter.)
Does the constituion has a concept of hats? You're either the DPL or
you're not. It seems Lucas is the DPL. If Lucas proposes an amendment, the
DPL has proposed an amendment, right?
Thijs
Reply to: