Re: Alternative proposal: support for alternative init systems is desirable but not mandatory

To: Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@debian.org>
Cc: debian-vote@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Alternative proposal: support for alternative init systems is desirable but not mandatory
From: Neil McGovern <neilm@debian.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 13:44:06 +0100
Message-id: <20141017124406.GM25032@halon.org.uk>
In-reply-to: <20141017074416.GA2520@xanadu.blop.info>
References: <21567.57029.724173.958520@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <20141017074416.GA2520@xanadu.blop.info>

On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 09:44:16AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> I am therefore bringing forward an alternative proposal

Recieved, and verified. Note, this has been proposed by the current
Project Leader, and thus does not require seconds, but will record those
seconding anyway.

Neil
--

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Alternative proposal: support for alternative init systems is desirable but not mandatory
  - From: Dimitri John Ledkov <xnox@debian.org>
- Re: Alternative proposal: support for alternative init systems is desirable but not mandatory
  - From: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>

References:
- Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems
  - From: Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
- Alternative proposal: support for alternative init systems is desirable but not mandatory
  - From: Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems
Next by Date: Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems
Previous by thread: Re: Alternative proposal: support for alternative init systems is desirable but not mandatory
Next by thread: Re: Alternative proposal: support for alternative init systems is desirable but not mandatory
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread