Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems

To: Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
Cc: debian-vote@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems
From: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 21:14:06 +0200
Message-id: <20141017191406.GA18124@roeckx.be>
In-reply-to: <21569.23669.46326.679749@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
References: <21567.57029.724173.958520@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <20141017180549.GA16177@roeckx.be> <21569.23669.46326.679749@chiark.greenend.org.uk>

On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 07:14:13PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx writes ("Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems"):
> > I think those 2 conflict, and that if you want to use the TC
> > powers it would fall under 4.1.4.
> 
> Kurt, we had that conversation in March.  Can you please go back and
> read the thread then ?  After that extended conversation, you wrote
> this, which ended the subthread:

So let's just assume for now that I would come to the same
conclusion.


Kurt

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems
  - From: Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org>

References:
- Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems
  - From: Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
- Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems
  - From: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
- Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems
  - From: Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: Alternative proposal: support for alternative init systems is desirable but not mandatory
Next by Date: Re: [RFC] Alternative proposal: reaffirm upstream and maintainers technical competence over the software they maintain
Previous by thread: Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems
Next by thread: Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread