Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems
Jonathan Dowland <email@example.com> writes:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 08:38:25AM +0100, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> > I wonder if, in the circumstances, the DPL should use their power
> > under 4.2.4 to reduce the discussion period to 1 week.
> I think this is a terrible idea. I agree that there are entrenched people on
> two sides of the argument, but there are others (myself included) who want to
> give a well-constructed GR (thus, we need a round of amendments to consider)
> proper, thorough consideration.
> If we start messing with the GR process in this way then whoever is on the
> losing side of the outcome will call the whole process foul.
"At least you know where you are with Microsoft."
"True. I just wish I'd brought a paddle."