Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems
Adam D. Barratt writes ("Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems"):
> Speaking for no-one other than myself, I _am_ very unhappy that given
> how long the discussion has been rumbling on for, and how much
> opportunity there has been, that anyone thought that two weeks before
> the freeze (which has had a fixed date for nearly a year now) was the
> right time to raise this.
I'm very unhappy about that too. The right time to raise this was in
March when Matthew proposed it and I seconded it.
But that doesn't mean that it isn't still important now.
Ian.
Reply to: