Re: First call for votes for the Lenny release GR
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 04:27:22PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>This is where I have a strong disagreement with Manoj and apparently with
>you. I don't think there's any justification in the constitution for
>requiring a developer statement about the project's sense of the meaning
>of the SC and the DFSG to have a 3:1 majority, or to make a developer
>override to enforce that sense of the meaning.
>Both the override and the statement about the meaning of the documents
>should require 1:1. 3:1 should only be required when the documents are
>explicitly superseded or changed, not just for making a project statement
>about their interpretation.
And that's my interpretation too. I think the constitution is quite
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. email@example.com
You lock the door
And throw away the key
There's someone in my head but it's not me