[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bundled votes and the secretary

On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 06:38:34PM +0000, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 12:42:20PM +0000, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> > However, I think retitling 5 to: "Assume firmware blobs are in source
> > form unless proven otherwise" is worthwhile as is retitling 1 to: "Delay
> > Lenny release until all DFSG issues are resolved".
> > I wouldn't say this is the secretary trying to skew anything, I just
> > think that it makes the meaning of the choices slightly clearer. If
> > people read the text below then it is clear.
> As written in
> <http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2008/12/msg00003.html>, this is not the
> case at all.  It's possible that the secretary didn't notice this mail
> because I didn't cc: him; but if he saw this mail and chose not to
> acknowledge the arguments, then he is behaving in a wholly improper manner
> with regard to this vote, and frankly I see no reason that we as a project
> should even honor the outcome of a vote on this ballot as presented.

I second that.
·O·  Pierre Habouzit
··O                                                madcoder@debian.org
OOO                                                http://www.madism.org

Attachment: pgpoG4_kb6frD.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: