On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 06:38:34PM +0000, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 12:42:20PM +0000, Matthew Johnson wrote: > > However, I think retitling 5 to: "Assume firmware blobs are in source > > form unless proven otherwise" is worthwhile as is retitling 1 to: "Delay > > Lenny release until all DFSG issues are resolved". > > > I wouldn't say this is the secretary trying to skew anything, I just > > think that it makes the meaning of the choices slightly clearer. If > > people read the text below then it is clear. > > As written in > <http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2008/12/msg00003.html>, this is not the > case at all. It's possible that the secretary didn't notice this mail > because I didn't cc: him; but if he saw this mail and chose not to > acknowledge the arguments, then he is behaving in a wholly improper manner > with regard to this vote, and frankly I see no reason that we as a project > should even honor the outcome of a vote on this ballot as presented. I second that. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O madcoder@debian.org OOO http://www.madism.org
Attachment:
pgpoG4_kb6frD.pgp
Description: PGP signature